[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main In Press Current Issue All Issues Search register ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Editorial Policy::
Registration::
Contact us::
indexing and abstracting::
::
..
Indexing

 

 

 

 

 
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Creative commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

..
:: Volume 25, Issue 1 (Spring 2025) ::
J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2025, 25(1): 26-37 Back to browse issues page
Investigating Factors Affecting the Quality of Clinical Education from the Perspective of Dental Students of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences in 2024
Soheila Derisavy Jorfian * , Ghadir Pourbayramian , Erfan Belalzadeh
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran , s.derisavy@gmail.com
Abstract:   (59 Views)
Background: Clinical education, as a cornerstone of dental training, plays a pivotal role in cultivating professional dentists and preparing them for therapeutic challenges. Given that the quality of clinical education directly influences students' professional competencies and subsequently the quality of healthcare services, identifying the factors affecting its quality is of paramount importance. Considering the key role of dental students as primary stakeholders in clinical education and the significance of their perspectives for program reforms, and noting the absence of a comprehensive study in this regard at Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, the present study was conducted to identify factors affecting the quality of clinical education and to propose improvement strategies based on students' viewpoints.
Methods: This descriptive-cross-sectional study was conducted in the second semester of the 2024 academic year among dental students at Ardabil University of Medical Sciences who had completed at least two semesters in clinical education settings and was willing to participate. Using Morgan's table, a sample size of 177 students was estimated. Participants were selected randomly from available students in various departments of the dentistry faculty. The data collection instrument was a questionnaire comprising 26 items across 5 main domains of clinical education quality, rated on a five-point Likert scale. A significance level of 0.05 was considered.
Results: The findings indicated that educational objectives and programs (β=0.328) and instructor’s performance (β=0.303) had the most significant impact on the quality of clinical education. Subsequently, the educational environment (β=0.218) and interaction with students (β=0.188) were of lesser importance, respectively. Evaluation (β=0.136) had the least impact on the quality of clinical education. Furthermore, older students and those in higher academic semesters evaluated the quality of clinical education more positively. No significant differences were observed in the evaluation of clinical education quality based on gender or clinical education groups.
Conclusion: From the perspective of dental students at Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, educational objectives and programs, along with instructors, are the most decisive factors in the quality of clinical education. Enhancing these two components, in addition to improving the educational environment and student interaction, is essential for increasing the quality of clinical education. It is recommended that educational policymakers focus on strengthening these areas.
Article number: 2
Keywords: Education, Clinical Education, Education Quality, Dental Student
Full-Text [PDF 292 kb]   (54 Downloads)    
Type of Study: article | Subject: Dentistry
Received: 2025/03/8 | Accepted: 2025/06/29 | Published: 2025/09/23
References
1. Joudyian N, Pour naghiazar F, Azami-Aghdash S, Mosavi A. Identification and comparison of factors affecting the quality of clinical education from the perspective of medical and dental students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in 2020. Educ Dev Judishapur. 2021;12(3):811-7. [Full text in Persian]
2. Sadeghi M, shakiba E. Evaluation of the quality of clinical education from the viewpoint of Rafsanjan dental school students. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2022;9(3):10-8. [Full text in Persian]
3. Tazakori Z, Mehri S, Mobaraki N, Dadashi L, Ahmadi Y, Shokri F, et al. Factors affecting on quality of clinical education from perspectives of operating room students. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2015;13(4):335-41. [Full text in Persian]
4. Ebrahiminia A, Asadinezhad M, Moladoust H. Quality of clinical education based on Radiology Technology students viewpoint in paramedical faculty of Guilan University of medical sciences. Med Educ. 2017;5(2):41-9. [Full text in Persian]
5. Madani RA. Analysis of educational quality, a goal of education for all policy. High Educ Stud. 2019;9(1):100-9. [DOI:10.5539/hes.v9n1p100]
6. Tanaomi MM. Managing universities and higher education institutions: recognizing and implementing inclusive quality. Tehran: Samt; 2017. P: 107-11. [Full text in Persian]
7. Khadivi A, Seyyed Kalan M, Hossein Pour T. Affecting factors on teaching and education quality in farhangian university (Case Study: College of Ardabil). J Res Eva. 2018;11(42):161-85. [Full text in Persian]
8. Hoveida R, Molavi H. Academic quality improvement process from the viewpoints of faculty members of universities in Isfahan province: A comparison based on Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP). Iran J Med Sci. 2008;8(1):132-41. [Full text in Persian]
9. Lagrosen S, Seyyed‐Hashemi R, Leitner M. Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education. Qual Assur Educ. 2004;12(2):1-7. [DOI:10.1108/09684880410536431]
10. Safarnavadeh M, Mohamadi Farsani F. The Integrated curriculum model in Iran dental education. Qual Res J. 2016;1(1):61-80. [Full text in Persian]
11. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction: Routledge; 2013. P: 60-8. [DOI:10.4324/9780203017609-14]
12. General Dentistry Curriculum In Iran [Internet]. Online. 2012. Available from: https://dentistryfac.tbzmed.ac.ir. [Full text in Persian]
13. Safari M, Yazdanpah B, Mahmoudi F, Yaghobean N. Comparing students' rate of learning through lecturing and peer group teaching and study their viewpoints. Res Med Edu. 2018;10(3):24-34. [Full text in Persian] [DOI:10.29252/rme.10.3.24]
14. Plasschaert A, Lindh C, McLoughlin J, Manogue M, Murtomaa H, Nattestad A, et al. Curriculum structure and the european credit transfer system for european dental schools: part I. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10(3):123-30. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00404.x] [PMID]
15. Fullan M. The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning: Springer; 2005. P: 202-16. [DOI:10.1007/1-4020-4451-8_12]
16. Azizi F. The reform of medical education in Iran. Med Educ J. 1997;31(3):159-62. [Full text in Persian] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02559.x] [PMID]
17. Alipour Haydari M, Hasanzadeh GR, HajiSeied Javadi Z. Attitude of dentistry students at clinical sections of Qazvin Medical University towards the application of basic sciences courses. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;6(2):38-42. [Full text in Persian]
18. Gheraghi MA. Theorize on Theoretical Knowledge Transfer into Practice in Nursing: A Grounded Theory Approach. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2009;17(12):24-34. [Full text in Persian]
19. Scully NJ. The theory-practice gap and skill acquisition: An issue for nursing education. Collegian. 2011;18(2):93-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2010.04.002] [PMID]
20. Roshan Essani R, Ali TS. Knowledge and practice gaps among pediatric nurses at a tertiary care hospital Karachi Pakistan. Int Sch Res Notices. 2011;3(5):1-8. [DOI:10.5402/2011/460818] [PMID] []
21. Ben-Peretz M. Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? J Teach Educ. 2011;27(1):3-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.015]
22. Amin Khandaghi M, Zarghani A, Shabani Varaki B, Mosapour N. Rethinking on paradigms for curriculum implementation: The linkage between teachers theoretical and practical knowledge. Int J Educ Found Manag. 2016;6(1):46-68. [Full text in Persian]
23. Schwab JJ. The practical: A language for curriculum. Kennedy Sch Rev. 1978;78(1):1-23. [DOI:10.1086/442881]
24. Pinar W. What Is Curriculum Theory? : Taylor & Francis; 2019. P: 49-58. [DOI:10.4324/9781315625683]
25. Cochran-Smith M, Lytle SL. Chapter 8: Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Rev Res Educ. 1999;24(1):249-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167272 [DOI:10.3102/0091732X024001249]
26. Fenstermacher GD. Chapter 1: The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Rev Res Educ. 1994;20(1):3-56. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X020001003 [DOI:10.2307/1167381]
27. Khamverdi Z, Kasraee S, Rostamzadeh T, Yekta H. Educational objectives achieved by department of operative dentistry: Viewpoints of general dentists graduated from Hamedan dental school (2004-2009). Iran J Med Sci. 2012;12(5):387-95. [Full text in Persian]
28. Sadeghi M, Linch K. Dental students view of the posterior teeth were restored with composite learning Curve. J Dent Med Shiraz Univ Med Sci. 2009;9(4):394-401. [Full text in Persian]
29. Heidari A, Khatirnamani Z, Abbasabadi M, Rafiei N, Ahmadi M, Saravani H. The quality of educational services from viewpoints' Of dentistry students of Gorgan In 2021. J Mashad Dent Sch. 2023;47(3):263-74. [Full text in Persian]
30. Khan R, Khan S. Quality of dental education among students after graduation: a perspective study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;10(4):98-103.
31. Rayatdoost E, Jahromi RR, Ayalbar A, Kalani N. Factors Affecting The Quality Of Clinical Education From The Perspective Of ‎Medical Students. Int J Med Investig. 2022;11(1):142-53. [Full text in Persian]
32. Torres-Calixto MG. Trends and challenges of medical education. Rev Fac Med Univ. 2021;69(3):1-8. [DOI:10.15446/revfacmed.v69n3.84330]
33. Guíñez J, Guajardo P, Cartes-Velásquez R, Campos V. The current status of dental education and the dental profession in Chile. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin. 2018;18(1):3875-82. [DOI:10.4034/PBOCI.2018.181.23]
34. Mahyar Z, Paydar S, Pooresmaeil M, Allahyari I, Nemati Vakilabad R. A Survey of the Quality of Clinical Education from the Perspective of Nursing Students during the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. J Health Care. 2022;24(3):232-44. [Full text in Persian] [DOI:10.61186/jhc.24.3.232]
35. Elhami S, Heidari M, Ban M, Mosaviasl S, Khavasi M. The factors affecting effective clinical education from the viewpoint of students, Nursing Trainers, and nursing staff. Middle East J Fam Med. 2018;16(3):259-64. [Full text in Persian] [DOI:10.5742/MEWFM.2018.93335]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: IR.ARUMS.REC.1403.307


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Derisavy Jorfian S, Pourbayramian G, Belalzadeh E. Investigating Factors Affecting the Quality of Clinical Education from the Perspective of Dental Students of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences in 2024. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2025; 25 (1) : 2
URL: http://jarums.arums.ac.ir/article-1-2485-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 25, Issue 1 (Spring 2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4623