[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main In Press Current Issue All Issues Search register ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Editorial Policy::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
..
Indexing

 

 

 

 

 
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Creative commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

..
:: Guidelines for Reviewers ::
 | Post date: 2023/10/30 | 
    Peer Review Guide
   Remember that authors will appreciate both positive feedback and constructive criticism from you.
  1. Writing Your Report
    • Complete the review questions form to indicate the relative strengths or weaknesses of the paper.
    • A referee may disagree with the author’s opinions, but they should be allowed to stand if they are consistent with the available evidence.
    • Remember that authors will welcome positive feedback as well as constructive criticism from you.
  2. Answer Review Questions Form
    • The main factors you should provide advice on as a reviewer are the originality, presentation, relevance, and significance of the manuscript’s subject matter to the journal’s readership. The related link is here.
                                  https://jarums.arums.ac.ir/reviewers_zone.php?sid=1&slc_lang=en
  1. Make a Recommendation
    • Once you’ve read the paper and assessed its quality, you need to make a recommendation to the editor regarding publication. The key decisions are:
      • Accept: If the paper is appropriate for publication in its present format.
      • Minor Revision: If the paper will be ready for publication after minor revisions. Please list the recommended revisions point by point.
      • Major Revision: If the paper would benefit from substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, a broader literature review, or rewriting sections of the text.
      • Reject: If the paper is not suitable for publication with this journal or if the necessary revisions are too fundamental for the submission to continue being considered in its current form.

  
View: 331 Time(s)   |   Print: 79 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4623