1. Rashad M, Ali A, Ibraheem A. Cyclic fatigue resistance of one curve, Hyflex EDM and Neolix NiTi files in simulated curved canals. Indian J Public Health. 2020; 11(2):24-30. [ DOI:10.37506/v11/i2/2020/ijphrd/195211] 2. Ruiz X, Karanam KD. Rotary endodontics: a brief review. MAR Dental Sci. 2021; 2(4):1-10. 3. Thakur D, Makkar S, Mushtaq F, Mushtaq U. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue fracture resistance of newer Ni Ti rotary files: An in vitro study.Int J Appl Dent.2020; 6(3):571-574. [ DOI:10.22271/oral.2020.v6.i3i.1009] 4. Shen Y, Qian W, Abtin H, Gao Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of environment on fatigue failure of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012; 38(3):376-80. [ DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.002] [ PMID] 5. Madarati A, Watts D, Qualtrough A. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files. British Dent J. 2008; 204(5):241-5. [ DOI:10.1038/bdj.2008.152] [ PMID] 6. Gambarini G, Miccoli G, Zanza A, Del Giudice A, Testarelli L. How to improve properties of Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments. Dent Pract. 2020; 21(4):351-2. [ DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2796] 7. Tabassum S, Zafar K, Umer F. Nickel-Titanium rotary file systems: What's new? Eur Endod J. 2019; 4(3):111-120. [ DOI:10.14744/eej.2019.80664] [ PMID] [ ] 8. Khalilak Z, Fallahdoost A, Dadresanfar B, Rezvani G. Comparison of extracted teeth and simulated resin blocks on apical canal transportation. Iran Endod J. 2008; 3(4):109-118. 9. Shemesh H, Roeleveld AC, Wesselink PR, Wu M-K. Damage to root dentin during retreatment procedures. J Endod. 2011; 37(1):63-6. [ DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.002] [ PMID] 10. Ankrum M, Hartwell G, Truitt J. K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. J Endod. 2004; 30(4): 234-7. [ DOI:10.1097/00004770-200404000-00013] [ PMID] 11. Ertas H, Capar ID. An in vitro analysis of separation of multi‐use ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next instruments in extracted mandibular molar teeth. Scanning. 2015; 37(4):270-6. [ DOI:10.1002/sca.21209] [ PMID] 12. Aminsobhani M, Meraji N, Sadri E. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of five nickel titanium rotary file systems with different manufacturing techniques. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(9):636-46.[full text in persian] 13. Nabavizadeh MR, Sedigh-Shams M, Abdolrasoulnia S. Cyclic fatigue life of two single file engine-driven systems in simulated curved canals. Iran Endod J. 2018; 13(1):61-70. 14. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod. 2015; 41(4):535-8. [ DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.008] [ PMID] 15. Terauchi Y, Ali WT, Abielhassan MM. Present status and future direction: removal of fractured instrument. Int Endod J. 2022; 55(3):685-709. [ DOI:10.1111/iej.13743] [ PMID] |
.png)
.png){kind=small}
