Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences- Guidelines for Reviewers
Guidelines for Reviewers

Restore images and colors  | Post date: 2023/10/30 | 
    Peer Review Guide
   Remember that authors will appreciate both positive feedback and constructive criticism from you.
  1. Writing Your Report
    • Complete the review questions form to indicate the relative strengths or weaknesses of the paper.
    • A referee may disagree with the author’s opinions, but they should be allowed to stand if they are consistent with the available evidence.
    • Remember that authors will welcome positive feedback as well as constructive criticism from you.
  2. Answer Review Questions Form
    • The main factors you should provide advice on as a reviewer are the originality, presentation, relevance, and significance of the manuscript’s subject matter to the journal’s readership. The related link is here.
                                  https://jarums.arums.ac.ir/reviewers_zone.php?sid=1&slc_lang=en
  1. Make a Recommendation
    • Once you’ve read the paper and assessed its quality, you need to make a recommendation to the editor regarding publication. The key decisions are:
      • Accept: If the paper is appropriate for publication in its present format.
      • Minor Revision: If the paper will be ready for publication after minor revisions. Please list the recommended revisions point by point.
      • Major Revision: If the paper would benefit from substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, a broader literature review, or rewriting sections of the text.
      • Reject: If the paper is not suitable for publication with this journal or if the necessary revisions are too fundamental for the submission to continue being considered in its current form.

  
Topic URL in Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences website:
http://jarums.arums.ac.ir/find-1.134.40.en.html
Back to content primary page