[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main In Press Current Issue All Issues Search register ::
Main Menu
Home::
Editorial Board::
Editorial Policy::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Articles archive::
Registration::
Contact us::
::
..
Indexing

 

 

 

 

 

 
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Creative commons

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

..
:: Volume 14, Issue 3 (Autumn 2014) ::
J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2014, 14(3): 249-256 Back to browse issues page
The Comparison of Visual Evoked potential Abnormalities in Classic and Common Migraine Patients with Control Group
Sevda Parsa * , Davar Altafi
, honey_p1366@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (8503 Views)

  Background &objections: Migraine is the second most common cause of headache in15% of women and 6% of men. Migraine headaches areperiodic and usually with unilateral and throbbing quality,and often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, phonophobia, photophobia and malaise. Approximately 15-20% of migraine attacks start with visual aura or other neurological symptoms. So far there isn’t accurate and practical diagnostic test for this patients and diagnosis is based on clinical features and other causes. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of visual evoked potential (VEP) in patients with common and classic migraines and t effects on the electrophysiology of visual system and understanding pathophysiology in neurological symptoms.

  Methods: In this study, 44 migraine patients, including 28 patients with common and 16 patients with classical migraines admitted to neurology private clinics from January to June 2013 in Alavi hospital of Ardabil city and16 healthy volunteers (control group) were used. Mean wave, P100 Latency and P100-N140 Amplitude were compared and determined between three groups.

  Results: The mean latency of P100 migraine group was significantly higher than healthy people. Average P100-N140 amplitude of migraine group was fewer than the control group, and the mean P100-N140 amplitude was more common than classical group.

  Conclusions: Despite differences in results of VEP tests, VEP can be used as an adjuvant test in the diagnosis of migraine, as well as a confirmation for distinguishing common and classical migraine and can be used as a tool in determining the severity of migraine and/or a parameter for its electrophysiological effects. However, more detailed studies are needed in this area .

Keywords: Common Migraine, Classic Migraine, Visual Evoked Potential (VEP)
Full-Text [PDF 133 kb]   (3165 Downloads)    
Type of Study: article | Subject: Special
Received: 2013/09/28 | Accepted: 2014/04/12 | Published: 2014/09/28
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Parsa S, Altafi D. The Comparison of Visual Evoked potential Abnormalities in Classic and Common Migraine Patients with Control Group. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2014; 14 (3) :249-256
URL: http://jarums.arums.ac.ir/article-1-689-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 3 (Autumn 2014) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اردبیل Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4623